Skip to main content

CBDT on stay of demand

Analysing CBDT's Office memorandum dated 29.02.2016 regarding stay of demand
Reference to the relevant paragraph in the Union Budget Speech 2016
Paragraph 169 of the Union Budget 2016
"The Income-tax Department is also issuing instruction making it mandatory for the assessing officer to grant stay of demand once the assesse pays 15% of the disputed demand, while the appeal is pending before Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). In case of deviation, assessing officer has to get orders of his superiors. The tax payer also has an option to go to superior officer in case he does not agree with conditions of stay order passed by the subordinate officer."
Reference to the present office memorandum
F.No.404/72/93-ITCC dated 29.02.2016
Why this new office memorandum?
For partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.03.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first appeal stage
What is the existing provision in Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.03.1996 on the subject?
Ref: part 'C'of the Instruction
• A demand will be stayed only if there are valid reasons for doing so
• Mere filing of an appeal against the assessment order will not be a sufficient reason to stay the demand.
• While granting stay, the Assessing officers (AO) may require the assessee to offer a suitable security (bank guarantee, etc.) and/ or require the assessee to pay a reasonable amount in lump sum or in installments.
What is the hardship faced by assessees at present
AOs often insist on payment of a very high proportion of the disputed demand before granting stay of the balance demand. This often results in hardship for the taxpayers seeking stay of demand.
What is sought to be achieved through this new office memorandum?
To streamline and standardize the quantification of the 'lumpsum amount' to be paid by the assessee in order to grant stay of the balance amount by the AO
What are the new conditions vis-à-vis grant of stay?
• the outstanding demand shall be disputed before CIT (A)
• the AO shall grant stay of demand till disposal of first appeal on payment of 15% of the disputed demand
• Subject to the two exceptions that are listed below
Exception 1 – AO can demand payment of a sum higher that 15%
If the AO is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount higher than 15% is warranted (e.g. in a case where addition on the same issue has been confirmed by appellate authorities in earlier years or the decision of the Supreme Court /or jurisdictional High Court is in favour of Revenue or addition is based on credible evidence collected in a search or survey operation, etc.) or,
Exception 2 – AO can permit payment of a sum lower that 15%
If the AO is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount lower than 15% is warranted (e.g. in a case where addition on the same issue has been deleted by appellate authorities in earlier years or the decision of the Supreme Court or jurisdictional High Court is in favour of the assessee, etc.)
What should the AO do in cases of Exception 1 or Exception 2?
The AO shall refer the matter to the administrative Pr. CIT/ CIT, who after considering all relevant facts shall decide the quantum/ proportion of demand to be paid by the assessee as lump sum payment for granting a stay of the balance demand.
The AO grants stay of demand after payment of 15% of disputed tax by assessee and if the assessee is still aggrieved, what shall he do?
The assessee can approach the jurisdictional administrative Pr. CIT/ CIT for a review of the decision of the assessing officer.
Time limit for disposing off the stay application by AO
The AO shall dispose of a stay petition within 2 weeks of filing of the petition
Time limit before PrCIT or CIT of disposing off AO's reference application or assessee's review application
The same shall be disposed of by the Pr. CIT/ CIT within 2 weeks of the assessing officer making such reference or the assessee filing such review, as the case may be.
Conditions that can be imposed by the AO for granting stay of demand
The AO may impose such conditions as he may think fit. He may, inter alia
• require an undertaking from the assessee that he will cooperate in the early disposal of appeal failing which the stay order will be cancelled;
• reserve the right to review the order passed after expiry of reasonable period (say 6 months) or if the assessee has not cooperated in the early disposal of appeal, or where a subsequent pronouncement by a higher appellate authority or court alters the above situations;
• reserve the right to adjust refunds arising, if any, against the demand, to the extent of the amount required for granting stay and subject to the provisions of section 245.
Effective date
Immediate effect from 29.02.2016


Popular posts from this blog


CONTENTS SR. NO. CHAPTER PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION STOCK & RECEIVABLES AUDIT VERIFICATION OF STOCK & DEBTORS PROCEDURE OF STOCK AUDIT VERIFICATION OF SECURITIES ANALYTICAL REVIEW INTERNAL CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE STOCK b) BOOK DEBTS LIST OF DOCUMENTS TAKEN AS WORKING PAPERS SPECIMEN INSPECTION REPORT SPECIMEN MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATION LETTER CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: Banking is an important sector of the economy of any country and for the development of the economy a healthy banking system is a must. After the liberalization of the economy, the banking system has undergone a total change in India. There is hard competition in the banking industry to survive in the current circumstances. With the purpose to have better financial discipline & to ensure uniformity in accounting norms RBI introduced the concept of assetclassification & income recognition as per the recommendations of Narasimhan Committee. It was also suggested to classify the advances given by banks into Performing & Non Perfor…

A Complete Guide to sections 54 & 54F Exemptions - T.V. GANESAN CS

A Complete Guide to sections 54 & 54F Exemptions T.V. GANESAN CS If an individual transfers any long-term capital asset and plans to reinvest the sale proceeds in a new residential house property then he would be eligible to claim exemption under sections 54 and 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 subject to fulfilment of certain conditions. In the last couple of years there has been a phenomenal increase in the sale of properties resulting in capital gain including but not limited to the land owners giving the land to the developers and entering into Joint Development Agreement, receiving more than one flat from the builder and yet avoiding capital gains tax. In this article the author has enumerated various decisions and judgments of the Tribunals and the High Courts which have liberally interpreted the provisions of the Income-tax Act and extended the capital gains exemptions to the assessees. Introduction 1. Out of the various investment options available, investment in real estate …

Excel Add-in to convert amount in figures to words by Premal

AmtInWords.xla is attached to this mail. It is an MS Excel Add-in written by me to convert amount available in figures to words.
Copy the attached file to the folder where excel stores the add-ins. (To know where excel stores the add-ins, open any workbook, click on Tools - Add-ins - Browse)
Then open an excel workbook. Click on Tools - Add-ins - Browse - Give the path to this Addin - Ok
You can use the functions AmtInWords and AmtInWordsUS in any worksheet. The syntax is:
=AmtInWords(decimal number/cell reference, [currency code])
=AmtInWordsUS(decimal number/cell reference, [currency code])
Examples follow:
=AmtInWordsUS(B3) ' Shall give the amount in millions (US format)
=AmtInWordsUS(B3,"USD") ' Shall give the amount in millions (US format) and in US currency (Dollars)
=AmtInWords(C4,"GBP") ' Shall give the amount in lakhs and in UK currency (Pounds)
The system shall N…